-
Website
http://carlo.zottmann.org/ -
Original page
http://carlo.zottmann.org/2007/07/24/were-not-friends-sorry/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Vicki
1 comment · 1 points
-
Hendrik Mans
3 comments · 2 points
-
Daniel Ha
2 comments · 405 points
-
kentbrew
4 comments · 2 points
-
Mark Douglass
3 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
You're right about "friend", and I think the majority of sites use it much as some sentry on watch calling out if your friend or foe. (Always made me wonder who responds "foe" to that, but that's beside the point.)
Likewise, I've got some folks I deal with on a fairly regular basis whom I've never met. I agree that I'm also a bit reluctant to call them "friends" but then, one is flying down from Alaska in a few weeks (I'm not the reason he's coming down, but I do plan on meeting up and buying him lunch).
Your WoW clan buddy definitely fits that category, but for a lot of folks, that category is about as far up socially as they progress. They don't have "friends" like we traditionally think of them and have no context to work in. To not agree that you are his "friend" means that you, like the guy the sentry is calling out to, must be a "foe" and he felt betrayed.
"Contact" while technically correct, always seemed a bit formal. Perhaps "webbie" might suffice, since nobody knows what the hell that is either.
--
your webbie
jr
"I think there needs to be a new word."
You know what? I agree 100%. The landscape of human relationships is changing, especially when looking at an online environment, so why not use another word for this type of relation.
I don't think "webbie" is suited, mostly because I always think about online awards when hearing it.
I propose the use of "webster". I've checked "Wikipedia":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webster, the original meaning of the word has somewhat "expired", so let's re-use it. :)
Sincerely yours,
your webster Carlo
1. Acquaintance, associate, companion, friend refer to a person with whom one is in contact. An acquaintance is someone recognized by sight or someone known, though not intimately: a casual acquaintance. An associate is a person who is often in one's company, usually because of some work, enterprise, or pursuit in common: a business associate. A companion is a person who shares one's activities, fate, or condition: a traveling companion; companion in despair. A friend is a person with whom one is on intimate terms and for whom one feels a warm affection: a trusted friend.
I get what you're saying. In the particular context of social networking sites, contacts usually don't even meet my fairly loose labeling system. But I think you go a bit too far.
To be fair, I generally refer to these folks as "buddies", which may or may not jive with your classifications.
But as for twitter, I don't think it uses the word friend. They have followers and followees.
@Dan:
"If you are friendly with one another on a regular basis, are you not friends?"
No, I am not. By your definition, many of my coworkers would count as friends. I would "label" them as "buddies", mostly. (Again: this is not a sign of disrespect, as I still respect and like them.) As for "buddies" -- again, for _me_, that stands mostly for offline relationships, not online. Hmm.
@Udi: yes, they've changed that only a few days ago. When I wrote the post, I had forgotten about it. Good move, tho.
Thanks for the input, guys. I appreciate it.
BTW, I just singed up for a twitter account (mostly so I could follow fredrin and megatokyo) I think I try to grab accounts on jaiku and pownce, too.